事理性，歷史性與語言性之體系性：《真理與方法》從「遊戲」經「生命」至「言道」之哲學文本內在性詮釋與神學義理內在性道貫

南華大學機構典藏系統 > 本校期刊 > 揭諦 > Item 987654321/16328

jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/16328

题名:	事理性，歷史性與語言性之體系性：《真理與方法》從「遊戲」經「生命」至「言道」之哲學文本內在性詮釋與神學義理內在性道貫
其它题名:	The Systemic of Matter-of-factness, Historicity and Linguisticality: A philosophical text-immanent Interpretation and theological system-immanent cohesion from "Play" through "Life" to "Word" in Truth and Method
作者:	陸敬忠 Luh, Jing-Jong
貢獻者:	中原大學宗教研究所
关键词:	事理性;歷史性;語言性;哲學詮釋學;《真理與方法》;遊戲;形象;生命;此有;道成肉身 matter-of-factness;historicity;linguisticality;philosophical hermeneutics;"Truth and Method"Play;image;life;Dasein;incarnation;Word
日期:	2012-07-01
上传时间:	2013-12-24 16:25:18 (UTC+8)
出版者:	南華大學哲學與生命教育學系
摘要:	作為哲學詮釋學之經典，《真理與方法》不但揭示高達美詮釋學哲思諸基本觀念與理論要素如「遊戲」，「詮釋學循環」，「效應歷史」，「視域融合」，「問答對話辯證法」等，也隱涵著在其所提示的詮釋學三向度中亦即藝術向度、歷史或精神科學向度及語言向度的詮釋學哲思基設：事理性，歷史性與語言性。詮釋學之諸基設間及諸理論要素間的關係乃非系統奠基式的，而是體系性的，亦即互證相立，聯通融動的。本文便企圖透過對於《真理與方法》三大部份之為三大詮釋學向度中各自的基本或核心觀念亦即「遊戲」與「形象」，「生命」與「此有」以及「道成肉身」之「言道」之文本內在性詮釋來呈現該經典中所隱涵的詮釋學三基設及其間體系性的關係。就文本內在性詮釋而言，對於每組觀念之文本均先揭示其基本脈絡之鋪陳，然後梳理出其論述架構及其所隱涵的基設。然而就之義理內在性通論而言，三段文本詮釋正好通過其間基設之互聯而連貫自成為關於高達美詮釋學之整合性通論。 As a classic of philosophical hermeneutics, "Truth and Method", not only reveals Gadamer’s Hermeneutics philosophizing basic concepts and theoretical elements such as the "game", "hermeneutical circle" "effect-history", "fusion of horizons", "dialectic dialogue of question and answer" and so on, but also implies the three ground-presuppositions of hermeneutics–matter-of-factness, historicality, and linguisticality – in its three dimensions, ie die hermeneutical dimension of art, history or human science (Geistewissenschaft). The relations between the ground-presuppositions, basic concepts and theoretical elements are not systematic or fundamental-deductive, but systemic, which means that each one correlates with, interacts and confirms each other. This paper will attempt through a text-immanent interpretation of the basic or core concept of Gadamer’s hermeneutics like "play" and "image", "life" and "Dasein" and "incarnation" and "Word" in the three major parts in "Truth and Method" as the three hermeneutical dimensions to present the three hermeneutical ground-presuppositions and their systemic relations which imply in this work. For the purpose of text-immanent interpretation, it shall firstly reveal the lay-out of basic context for each concept-set, and then expose its framework of discourse and therefore the implied ground-presupposition. However, as regards the system-immanent dimension of a whole theory, the three text-immanent interpretations integrate into a coherent and holistic representation of Gadamer’s hermeneutics just through the interrelation of the three ground-presuppositions.
關聯:	揭諦 23期
显示于类别:	[本校期刊] 揭諦 [生死學系(生死學系碩士班,哲學與生命教育碩士班)] 揭諦

文件中的档案:

档案	描述	大小	格式	浏览次数
4012002301.pdf		1001Kb	Adobe PDF	947	检视/开启
index.html		0Kb	HTML	441	检视/开启

在NHUIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

TAIR相关文章

数据加载中.....