English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 18278/19583 (93%)
造訪人次 : 914299      線上人數 : 1196
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    南華大學機構典藏系統 > 本校期刊 > 揭諦 >  Item 987654321/16338
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/16338


    題名: Human Immortality in Aristotle and Mencius
    作者: Ho, Shu-Ching
    何淑靜
    貢獻者: 政治大學哲學系
    關鍵詞: human immortality;eudaimonia (happiness);ch'eng-Sheng(becoming a sage);theoria (contemplation);virtue-cultivation;god-like;heaven-like
    日期: 2013-07-01
    上傳時間: 2013-12-24 16:25:30 (UTC+8)
    出版者: 南華大學哲學與生命教育學系
    摘要: With regard to the ultimate end/ideal of human life, Aristotle's view looks very far away from Mencius': Aristotle takes it to be eudaimonia (happiness), while Mencius views it as Ch'eng-Sheng (becoming a sage). But, in this paper I argue that, while deeply going into their theories, we find that they share the very basic view: whoever reaches the ultimate end/ideal of human life becomes immortal (in spiritual sense), though there still are some differences between them. First, I inquiry onto the question: What kind of activity human engages can make him/her become immortal for both? Secondly, I focus on the foundation for such kind of activity in Aristotle and in Mencius. For Aristotle, the activity is a God-like activity, i.e. theoria (contemplation); whereas for Mencius it is a Heaven-like activity, i.e. continuously bringing out moral activity to the world and invisibly helping others to cultivate their virtue with no intention. As to the foundation, in Aristotle, it is nous (reason, intellect, mind), but in Mencius, it is Hsin (Human nature) or Hsing (Mind). Though they look so different at issue, they in several important respects are very similar or the same: (1) Aristotle's God and Mencius' Heaven are the same in the sense of their always being active. (2)For both, the human has a double identity, i.e. being human and being partially divine, and, of the two, being human has priority in human life. (3) In their view, the highest life or ideal can be actualized not for the many but for the few only. For Aristotle, that is the god-like man (whose life is immortal) but such sort of human is rarely found , and for Mencius only the sages who reach the highest level of life can attend (such as Yao, Shun and Confucius,) are actually capable of becoming as great as Heaven, i.e. immortal. (4)For both Aristotle and Mencius, the foundation for human's becoming immortal is immanent in human's life; based upon it, human can become immortal in terms of his/her own effort. And (5), their ethics, unlike most ethical theories, reach something immortal and contain a religious dimension.
    關聯: 揭諦
    25期
    顯示於類別:[本校期刊] 揭諦
    [生死學系(生死學系碩士班,哲學與生命教育碩士班)] 揭諦

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    4012002501.pdf421KbAdobe PDF1056檢視/開啟
    index.html0KbHTML556檢視/開啟


    在NHUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋