南華大學機構典藏系統:Item 987654321/16365
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18278/19583 (93%)
Visitors : 916204      Online Users : 712
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/16365


    Title: 尋求兩岸民主轉型的機會之窗：從團系興衰看政治甄補之重要性
    Other Titles: Window of the Opportunity of the Democratic Transitions: The Role of the Tuanpai (League Faction)
    Authors: 蔡文軒;陳蓉怡
    Tsai, Wen-Hsuen;Chen, Rung-Yi
    Contributors: 國立政治大學政治學系
    Department of Political Science, National Chengchi University
    Keywords: 兩岸政治發展;民主化;政治菁英;團系
    cross-strait political development;democratization;political elite;Tuanpai
    Date: 2012-07-01
    Issue Date: 2013-12-25 14:47:38 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 南華大學國際暨大陸事務學系
    Abstract: 本文分為兩大部分，第一部分是對民主化與威權轉型的文獻回顧，本文認為既有文獻的解釋模式均存在盲點，忽略了應從兩岸的政權屬性此一更高的視野進行探討。本文的第二部分便嘗試提出新的解釋方式，亦即從幹部輸送的成敗，來回答兩岸政治制度的民主化與否。本文認為，由於中國大陸共青團的組織力量健全，成功為中共政權培植一群「黨性」堅定的後備幹部，在領導體系的穩定下，有利於維繫一黨專政的體制。台灣救國團在1960年代後的職能迅速瓦解，當國民黨開始甄補黨外菁英的同時，也鬆動了領導體制的穩固。團系的興衰，開啟了兩岸民主化與否的「機會之窗」。
    The purpose of this study is to provide a theoretical framework to answer why Taiwan has been moving toward democratization while China is not. The first part is a literature review of Taiwan’s democratic transition. We find these theories capture specific aspects of Taiwan’s democratization while they often fail to take the most important vision: the nature of political regime. The second part presents a theory about the role of elite transmission of the Chinese Communist Youth League (CCYL) in the Chinese political system after 1978 and China Youth Corps (CYC) in the Kuomintang of China.We found CCYL has succeed in both providing talented cadres to the party state and in recruiting youth of different backgrounds and specialties to serve in the CCYL. CCYL, as a talent pool, has facilitated renewal and consolidation of the CCP. In contrast, The influence of CYC has waned since the 1960s. Meanwhile, Non governing elites was recruited in Kuomintang and challenged the KMT’s leadship regime. In other words, CCYL as the most important element of the eilte-transmission, accounts for the fortunes of the party state.
    Relation: 亞太研究通訊
    10期
    Appears in Collections:[Department of International and China Studies, The M.A. Program of Asia-Pacific Studies and Public Policy Studies] Newsletter of the Asia-Pacific research
    [The Journals of Nanhua University ] Newsletter of the Asia-Pacific research

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    5032001001.pdf537KbAdobe PDF927View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML2185View/Open


    All items in NHUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback