南華大學機構典藏系統:Item 987654321/17687
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18278/19583 (93%)
Visitors : 2123983      Online Users : 839
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/17687


    Title: CAI策略對高職學生視聽電子丙級檢定課程學習成效之研究
    Other Titles: An Effectiveness of CAI Strategy for Vocational High School Students in Preparation for Certification of Class C Technician of Consumer Electronics
    Authors: 周士閔
    Chou, Shih-min
    Contributors: 資訊管理學系
    吳光閔
    Guang-min Wu
    Keywords: 視聽電子丙級檢定;學習成效
    learning effectiveness;CAI;Certification of Class C Technician of Consumer Electronics
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2015-01-05 11:58:14 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本文主旨在探討CAI策略對高職學生視聽電子丙級檢定課程之學習成效。採準實驗研究之不等組前測—後測設計,以兩班高職電子科二年級學生為實驗對象,分為實驗組與控制組進行為期八週之教學實驗,實驗結束後進行後測學科及術科測驗,以探討不同教學策略對學生的學習成效及差異狀況。   研究所得之量化資料以應用軟體 - SPSS for Windows 12進行描述性統計、獨立樣本t 檢定及單因子共變數分析進行檢驗。分析結果發現:一、實驗組與控制組學生在後測之學科成績雖未達顯著差異,但實驗組成績高於控制組。二、實驗組與控制組學生在後測之術科成績達到顯著差異。三、在術科完成時間表現上,實驗組優於控制組。
      The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of CAI strategy for vocational high school students in their learning of courses required for Certification of Class C Technician of Consumer Electronics. The nonequivalent pretest-posttest design was adopted. Two second-year classes of the electronics department in a vocational high school were selected. The students were divided into the experimental group and the control group and given an eight-week experimental instruction on Class C consumer electronics. In order to compare the learning effectiveness between the two groups, both groups were given a subject test and a skill test after the experiment.     The obtained quantitative results were analyzed using methods including descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, and one-way ANCOVA on SPSS for Windows 12. The main conclusions were as follows: 1.The experimental group scored higher than the control group in the posttest of subject knowledge, but the difference was not significance. 2.The difference between the experimental group and the control group in the posttest of skills was significant. 3.The experimental group outperformed the control group in terms of skill test completion time.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Information Management] Disserations and Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    101NHU05396004-001.pdf2646KbAdobe PDF1301View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML522View/Open


    All items in NHUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback