歐盟食品安全法規對台灣食品衛生管理法之啟示－以水產養殖業為例

NHUIR > College of Social Sciences > Department of International and China Studies, The M.A. Program of Asia-Pacific Studies and Public Policy Studies > Disserations and Theses(M.A. Program in European Studies) > Item 987654321/17731

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/17731

Title:	歐盟食品安全法規對台灣食品衛生管理法之啟示－以水產養殖業為例
Other Titles:	Implications of EU Food Safety Regulations on Taiwan's Food Sanitation Governing Acts: A Review of Aquaculture Industry
Authors:	郭孟杰 Guo, Meng-jie
Contributors:	歐洲研究所毛樹仁 Shuh-ren Mao
Keywords:	食品安全法規;養殖水產;歐盟 European Union;Aquaculture;Food Safety Law
Date:	2012
Issue Date:	2015-01-05 12:02:48 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	歐盟從每個會員國有著自己一套的食品安全法規，在1997年開始制定出全體會員國都要共同遵守的「歐盟食品法規一般原則綠皮書」，2000年發佈的「食品安全白皮書」，不論會員國或非會員國，只要你有食品要在歐盟境內流通都必須依照它的規範，2002年實施新的食品及飼料快速預警系統（RASFF），對於歐盟會員國與第三方國家的食品與飼料安全有效的監測預警，2005年成立歐洲食品安全管理局（EFSA），負責歐盟境內外所有食品相關事務和監督食品鏈的安全，2006年起實施「歐盟食品及飼料安全管理法」將整個食物鏈納入食品安全之內，以及提高動物的福利。　　　本文由文獻分析台灣的養殖水產業從300年前的粗放式養殖至今外海箱網養殖、培育魚苗、新發現各魚種的養殖方式與超集約循環系統的養殖，使得台灣在水產養殖方面是世界上數一數二的國家。且用比較分析法分析台灣與歐盟雙方對養殖水產品衛生安全的法律，由於我國食品安全的規範與觀念無法與歐盟相同水準，導致外銷至歐盟的水產品必須在歐盟當地重新再檢驗，這對無論是活魚、冷藏和冷凍水產的貿易都是不利的，台灣可以運用歐盟提供的結構訓練計畫，達到雙方調和的目的，做為台灣食品安全法律提昇的準則。經由田野調查訪談的過程，瞭解當前實務層面對水產品外銷歐盟所會遭遇的各種問題，以及目前台灣有多少養殖戶開始養殖健康與安全水產提供人們食用，收購這類水產價格是否會比一般水產高出許多，歐盟的買家到台灣購買水產品會特別在意什麼事情，都需要經由訪談才能夠得到的第一手資料。　　　台灣與歐盟對食品安全不只有法規的差異存在，在觀念上也有很大的不同，我們需要彌補其法規與觀念的差異，甚至追求比歐盟更安全、健康的食品，以保護全世界消費者所購買之食品安全。　　Beginning from the stage that each member state having its own the Food Safety Law, until the passage of “Green Paper On the Principle of Food Law in the European Union” that all member states should follow in 1997, the European Union went ahead further to pass the “European Commission White Paper on Food Safety” in 2000, for which whether member states or not should be in accordance with its specifications as long as it wishes to have a circulation of food to be within the EU. Moreover, along with the implementation of the new Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed（RASFF）in 2002, effective monitoring and early warning for food and feed safety of the EU member states and third countries were employed. In 2005, the European Food Safety Authority（EFSA）was established which was responsible for the EU both inside and outside of all food-related affairs and supervision of the safety of the food chain. In 2006, Regulation (EC) No 183/2005 of The European Parliament and of The Council of 12 January 2005 laid down requirements for feed hygiene throughout the food chain into food safety, as well as to improve the welfare of animals. 　　　Taiwan’s aquaculture “Extensive Culture”, tracing back to 300 years ago to the current net cage, fingerling culture, the new way by culture and intensive circulating system aquaculture, is making Taiwan the best aquaculture’s country in the world. However, as Taiwan’s food safety law and ideas has not met the standards required by the EU, Taiwan’s aquatic products exported to EU must be re-inspected again by local authorities and therefore caused unfavorable results for live fish, chilled and frozen aquatic trade. Under these circumstances, this dissertation argues that Taiwan should adopted the Structure Training Plan（STP）provided by the EU in order to achieve the purpose of both to reconcile, as the upgrading of Taiwan’s food safety laws.
Appears in Collections:	[Department of International and China Studies, The M.A. Program of Asia-Pacific Studies and Public Policy Studies] Disserations and Theses(M.A. Program in European Studies)

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
101NHU05481002-001.pdf		955Kb	Adobe PDF	1031	View/Open
index.html		0Kb	HTML	294	View/Open

Loading...