南華大學機構典藏系統:Item 987654321/20062
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 18278/19583 (93%)
造访人次 : 944612      在线人数 : 563
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/20062


    题名: 腳部操作電風扇之人因設計與效用評價研究
    其它题名: Ergonomic Design and Performance Evaluation for Foot-controlled Electric Fans
    作者: 張駿業
    Chang, Chun-ye
    貢獻者: 應用藝術與設計學系碩士班
    蔡宏政
    Hung-cheng Tsai
    关键词: RP成型;電腦輔助設計;腳控立扇;再設計;人因工程
    Fan;Ergonomic Design;CAD;RP
    日期: 2009
    上传时间: 2015-03-25 16:30:50 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 　　本研究透過實驗確立目前市售手控立扇的操作缺點及改進空間。利用人因工程論點再設計，包含人體計測、人體能力限制、實驗結果及現有產品分析導入腳控立扇設計，利用電腦輔助設計與快速成型(RP, Rapid Prototyping)發展出踩踏式、腳踢式、滑桿式與旋鈕式四種原型。以人因效用評價實驗比較研究所設計之四種原型、現有腳控立扇與手控立扇在受測者操作上的表現。並取得23位男性與27位女性受測者在實驗中的主觀評價、操作時間、失誤次數及樣本滿意度排序，實驗結果使用SPSS統計軟體之多變量變異數分析進行探討。　　　　結果發現踩踏式原型立扇有最高的主觀評價、現有手控立扇最低；踩踏式原型立扇操作時間花費最短、現有腳控立扇操作時間最長；踩踏式原型立扇失誤次數最少、現有手控立扇則最多。受測者對於踩踏式原型立扇在各方面的評價與滿意度皆為最好；現有手控立扇除操作時間優於現有腳控立扇外，皆為最差。最後，研究成功透過人因觀點設計出符合用腳操控之立扇，但皆處原型階段，在材質、機構、外觀與操作回饋等還有設計之空間。研究成果亦可提供往後研究或設計之參考。
    　　This study found out the faults of operation and made improvements on the hand-controlled electric fan through pre-experiments. Ergonomics-based redesign of foot-controlled electric fans contains anthropometry, human ability and the result of per-experiment. Through the tools of computer aided design (CAD) and rapid prototyping (RP), four kinds of foot-controlled prototypes, i.e. button-treading, button-kicking, sliding-bar and turning-knob, were developed. Four prototypes (developed in this research) and two existing products (one hand-controlled type and one foot-controlled type) by ergonomic evaluation experiments. The subjects (23 males and 27 females) were asked to perform ergonomic evaluation experiment on the six samples. Subjective evaluation, operation time, loss times and satisfaction degree were shown and discussed by using SPSS software.　　　　The results revealed that type of button-tread got highest subjective evaluation and the existing hand-controlled type received the lowest scores. Regarding the operation time, button-tread type took the shortest time and the existing foot-controlled type is the worst. Regarding the loss times, button-tread type was the best (fewest losses) and hand-controlled type was the worst. Totally, button-tread type was mostly best on evaluations and satisfaction degree. The existing hand-controlled type was worse than the foot-controlled one except the item of operation time. 　　　　Final, a foot-controlled electric fan was successfully developed in this research through ergonomics viewpoints. Although the prototypes were not perfect, future studies and advances are still required on the aspects of material, mechanisms, appearances and operation feedback.
    显示于类别:[產品與室內設計學系] 博碩士論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    097NHU05509004-001.pdf2331KbAdobe PDF1545检视/开启
    index.html0KbHTML240检视/开启


    在NHUIR中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈