資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/20569
|
| 題名: | 歐盟刑事司法合作之研究 |
| 其他題名: | A study of EU's judicial cooperation in criminal matters |
| 作者: | 李光桓
Li, Guang-huan |
| 貢獻者: | 歐洲研究所
沈玄池
Cen-chu Shen |
| 關鍵詞: | 歐盟統合;歐洲政治合作;馬斯垂克條約;刑事司法合作;引渡;歐盟逮捕令
EU integration;The Treaty of Maastricht;European Arrest Warrant;Cooperation in European Poltics;Judicial cooperation in criminal matters;Extradition |
| 日期: | 2007 |
| 上傳時間: | 2015-05-10 16:14:03 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 歐盟統合進程係一個動態的概念，由於各國需要和平的大方向下，由較無爭議的經濟議題達成共識，一歩歩地擴大及加深各國人民間之互動，期望能實現政治統合的目標，雖然過程艱辛，惟各國都認知歐洲統合是歐洲人們的共識，在一連串的折讓過程中，每每總是能突破困境。 關於歐盟內政與司法領域的統合 ，始於20世紀70年代的摧危（TREVI）小組，當時以論壇的方式協商，係屬非正式合作。1987年由於單一歐洲法（Single European Act）第8a條規定欲實現的四大流通 ，其中關於人的自由流通，伴隨著諸多犯罪防治等社會問題，此種問題並不能以傳統軍事安全概念理解，而是屬新的安全議題，而獲得參與統合的歐洲各國的重視。因而促使各會員國重視關於內政與司法領域的合作。 馬斯垂克條約（The Treaty of Maastricht ）、阿姆斯特丹條約（The Treaty of Amsterdam）及尼斯條約（The Treaty of Nice）分別象徵歐洲統合重要的關鍵條約 。直至1992年馬斯垂克條約生效後，納入條約規範，象徵歐洲統合不僅係經濟的統合更代表歐洲各國統合的目標是要朝向一個政治統合的實體；其最大的意義係在條約上首次將內政與司法方面的合作明文化。爾後歐洲各國持續藉由區域合作，不斷促進各國在內政及司法方面的合作，阿姆斯特丹條約生效後，更將移民、庇護、簽證及民事司法合作等事務共同體化。而同屬馬約所認定具共同利益之刑事司法合作關於共同打擊犯罪，則設有歐洲警察署（Europol）、歐洲司法合作單位（Eurojust）以政府間合作方式運作，有賴持續深化統合。 自阿姆斯特丹條約開始，係為將歐盟建構成為自由、安全和公正之區域，歐盟部長理事會更於2002年，通過關於歐盟逮捕令之架構決定，與傳統具濃厚政治決定色彩之引渡制度不同，為新的司法合作方式。
The progress on EU integration is a activated concept which based on the inquiry of peace by all the nations around the world. This concept is reached the agreement by the discussion of undeniable Economic issue and expend and intensive the interaction between the people from different nations. Although the procedure to accomplish the target of politics integration is extremely arduous, EU integration is regarded as the only Consensus during the process of negotiation and argument. The integration between EU Interior and judiciary is begun by TREVI in 1970s. This is not official cooperation but use the way of Forum for negotiation. In 1987, four important movements would like to be practiced according to the regulation 8a within Single European Act. However, one of the movement, People’s free movement, has come along with a lot of social problems such as Anti-Preventive. This kind problem is not able to be understood by using traditional Military Security concept but belong to new security issue which has been taken account by the EU countries who involved in the integration issue and drive the attention to the cooperation between EU Interior and judiciary The Treaty of Masstricht, The Treaty of Amsterdam, and The Treaty of Nice are presented as the key treaties for EU integration. After The Treaty of Masstricht was practiced in 1992, EU integration is not only for Economic integration but also present that the final target for EU countries is toward Politics integration. The most valuable meaning is to list the treaty for the cooperation between Interior and judiciary for the first time. After that, all the EU countries can improve the cooperation between Interior and Judiciary by Area cooperation. After the affection of The Treaty of Amsterdam, the affairs such as immigration, asylum, visa, civil Judicature has joined as a community. Regarding to the Criminal and Judicial cooperation for Penal- Judicature cooperation within The Treaty of Amsterdam, Europol and Euojust have been operated by governments as the new way for cooperation. The beginning of The Treaty of Amsterdam has built EU as freedom, safety, and justice’s area. Council of the European Union decided the framework for The European Arrest Warrant which is the new way of Judicature cooperation and this kind of cooperation is different from the traditional Extradition system with politics color. |
| 顯示於類別: | [國際事務與企業學系(亞太研究碩士班,公共政策研究碩士班,歐洲研究碩士班)] 博碩士論文-歐洲研究碩士班
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
描述 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| 096NHU05481002-001.pdf | | 1309Kb | Adobe PDF | 0 | 檢視/開啟 | | index.html | | 0Kb | HTML | 191 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在NHUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
