資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/20601
|
| 題名: | 中國大陸的南海政策 |
| 其他題名: | Mainland China's Policy for the South China Sea |
| 作者: | 黃原亮
Huang, Yuan-Liang |
| 貢獻者: | 亞洲太平洋研究所
郭冠廷
Kuan-ting Kuo |
| 關鍵詞: | 南海
South China Sea |
| 日期: | 1999 |
| 上傳時間: | 2015-05-11 15:33:22 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 後冷戰時代以來，亞太地區由於疆界、宗教及種族等因素，至少有11個區域仍然潛藏著各種可能的衝突危機。在這些潛在的衝突區域之中，尤以南海所牽涉的國家最多，領土爭議的範圍最廣，實具有高度的複雜性。 南海的戰略地位極其重要，它是印度洋通往太平洋的必經之路，海底蘊藏大量的石油及天然氣，再加上豐沛的漁業資源，使得區域內外各國莫不寄予高度重視。 1982年聯合國海洋法公約通過，環南海國家以此為基礎，展開了各種維護南海主權的行動。1988年，中國大陸與越南爆發「赤瓜礁」海戰；1995年中國大陸也與菲律賓發「美濟礁」爭議。由於這二次重大的衝突，南海周邊國家莫不視中國大陸為最大的威脅來源。 中國大陸事實上是南海地區最有影響力的國家，她的一舉一動都對南海局勢產生重大的衝擊。 1990年後，協商機制被引用於南海問題的解決。但是，無論是主權爭議或是共同開發，至今仍無共識，南海的發展面臨了重重的困境。 在這些困境下，中國大陸的南海政策面臨了諸多挑戰，由於她本身在政策上具有「雙重性格」，更使得南海爭議的解決難以令人樂觀。中國大陸南海政策的演變過程，凸顯了政策上的「雙重性格」，此乃本文主要的研究重點。 現階段中國大陸的南海政策以「主權屬我，擱置爭議，共同開發」為指導原則，既追求「和平」，也尋求「發展」，不過政治與經濟問題的矛盾性尚難統一，本文在結論中提出將政治問題與經濟問題分開，各自提到不同的層次去協商，或可作為解決南海問題的新思維方向。
The Asia-Pacific area has existed eleven potential conflict zones at least on account of boundary, religion and race since post-war era. All of these ones, the South China Sea, involving the most states and the largest scope about territory as well, has more complicated than others. The strategic location of the South China Sea is very important because that it is the route of passing from the Indian Ocean to the Pacific Ocean and vice versa, moreover, it is widely speculated, a vast potential source of undersea minerals, oil, and natural gas, still, it is a major fishing ground. Of all these interests leads many states, inner or outer around the South China Sea, to show grave concern. After executing the United Nations Convention of Law of Sea in 1982, these states located around the South China Sea have demonstrated ambitious actions. Finally, Mainland China fight with Vietnam in Chugai Jiao, and disputed with Philippine in Meiji Jiao later, both events have been interpreted ＂China Threat＂from the point of view the South-East Asia states. In fact, Mainland China is the powerful state whose action to the South China Sea results to tremendous influences. Thus the approach to negotiation imposed by the disputed states in this region for the purpose of preventing the possibility of war. The effect, however, is so bad that still leave dilemma. Furthermore, Mainland China's policy for the South China Sea, especially in Spratlys, impresses us the ＂dual personality＂in itself, also enhances the complexity of dilemma of the South China Sea. This thesis focuses on the characteristics of ＂dual personality＂of Mainland China's policy for the South China Sea in view of the process of policy transformation, and to understand the behavior of Mainland China in this region. Basically, the principle of Mainland China's contemporary policy for the South China Sea can be referred to as ＂ Sovereignty belonging to myself, Disputes suspending and Collective cooperation,＂The policy not only pursues＂Peace＂but also seek for ＂Development,＂Yet the paradox between political claims and economic demands, Mainland China only maintain ＂status quo＂ in the South China Sea. Problem must be solved at last, but it is not a good idea to combine political and economic trouble. From these draw my conclusion that we may separate these two problems, and put different levels receptively, in order to let the political dilemma have belongings and then economic cooperation can be expected. |
| 顯示於類別: | [國際事務與企業學系(亞太研究碩士班,公共政策研究碩士班,歐洲研究碩士班)] 博碩士論文-亞太研究碩士班
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
描述 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| index.html | | 0Kb | HTML | 657 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在NHUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
