資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/20659
|
| 題名: | 臺灣、日本及南韓經濟發展模式之比較研究 |
| 其他題名: | A Comparative Study on the Development Model of Taiwan, Japan and South Korea |
| 作者: | 朱長治
Chu, Chang-Chih |
| 貢獻者: | 亞洲太平洋研究所
孫以清;陳玉璽
Sun Yi-Ching;Chen Yu-His |
| 關鍵詞: | 台灣;日本;南韓;經濟發展模式
Taiwan;Japan;South Korea;economic development model |
| 日期: | 2000 |
| 上傳時間: | 2015-05-12 13:41:24 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 「東亞奇蹟」自1970年代起受到廣泛討論，台灣、日本及南韓則被認為是東亞經濟發展模式的代表。本研究從國際層面、國家層面及企業層面，採取跨學科研究方法，對台灣、日本及南韓的經濟發展模式，進行比較研究。首先，就國際層面而言，美國基於國家安全及經濟利益之考量，透過美援、資金、技術及市場的開放，協助東亞地區的經濟發展，是為「依附型發展」。同時，美國與東亞地區結合成「互補性經濟體系」，實現美國「全球整合戰略」之目標。其次，就國家層面而言，東亞地區國家機關制訂經濟政策，透過一系列機制與政策，介入經濟發展過程。因此，東亞地區的經濟發展，在相當程度上是國家機關「策略性引導」經濟發展。第三，就企業層面而言，由於企業透過縱向及橫向網絡的運作，靈活因應外在環境變遷，提供國際市場所需，促成國家經濟發展。所以，「企業組織網絡體系」的高度整合是東亞經濟發展的一個重要因素。 除了這些共同點，此三個經濟體有差異存在。在國際層面上，南韓較依賴國際性貸款，台灣則對外國技術依附較深，日本由於具有「中進國優勢」，所以對外部因素依附情況並不嚴重。其次，就國家層面而言，南韓及日本的國家機關所扮演的角色比台灣更傾向國家中心論。第三，就企業層面而言，南韓及日本企業組織網絡間緊密結合，台灣企業組織網絡則是鬆弛的交易關係。 最後，本研究論述此三個經濟體目前所面臨之挑戰，並指出東亞經濟快速復甦的原因及展望未來「新經濟時代」的經濟前景。
The East Asian development model has been a central topic in Asian Studies since the late 1970s and Taiwan, Japan and South Korea were considered representative of that model. This thesis compares the economic development of Taiwan, Japan and South Korea on three levels: international factors, the role of the state and business organizations. On the international level, the USA, for strategic reasons, used aid, capital, technology and domestic market to help develop the East Asian economies. It is a case of dependent development. On the state level, the East Asian states have implemented a series of economic policies to intervene in the development process. It is a development model guided by the strategic goals of the state. On the business organizational level, the East Asian firms use networks of vertical and horizontal integration to enhance production efficiency and competitive edge in international markets. These business networks are very important for the development of these East Asian economies. This thesis discusses the major differences among the three economies. On the international level, South Korea emphasized international loans rather than foreign direct investment while Taiwan was dependent on foreign investment and technology, and Japan did not attach much importance to foreign inputs. As far as the state role is concerned, South Korea and Japan leaned more heavily on the state planning than Taiwan. They use government resources to help build large-scale enterprises while Taiwan concentrated on small and medium-size enterprises. As for business organizations, big enterprises in South Korea and Japan are highly integrated in capital, production and distribution while Taiwan’s small and medium-sized firms lack in such integration. Finally, this thesis discusses the challenges being faced by the three economies. We explore the factors behind the quick recovery from the economic and financial crisis and predict the future prospects of these economies on the basis of the IT-powered “new economy”. |
| 顯示於類別: | [國際事務與企業學系(亞太研究碩士班,公共政策研究碩士班,歐洲研究碩士班)] 博碩士論文-亞太研究碩士班
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
描述 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| index.html | | 0Kb | HTML | 273 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在NHUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
