東石養蚵業的生產與勞動之研究

NHUIR > College of Social Sciences > Department of International and China Studies, The M.A. Program of Asia-Pacific Studies and Public Policy Studies > Disserations and Theses(M.A. Program in Public Policy Studies) > Item 987654321/21066

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/21066

Title:	東石養蚵業的生產與勞動之研究
Other Titles:	Study on the production and labor of oyster-cultivating industry in Tungshih
Authors:	潘文欽 Pan, Wen-Ching
Contributors:	公共行政與政策研究所許雅斐 Ya-Fei Hsu
Keywords:	東石;養蚵業;生產;勞動;中心;邊陲 Tungshih;peripheral;core
Date:	2003
Issue Date:	2015-05-28 10:15:34 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本文主以區域發展的研究角度，探討東石地區的發展過程概況，在何種特殊的自然環境、人文背景、國家政策、地區文化因素相互配合與決定下，成為一個養蚵業的專業生產區。然東石養蚵產業的固有特性，讓居民產生了何種生產與勞動意識，而形塑著居民每日的生活行為，使其脫離不了初級產業的生產。　　　　在華勒斯坦的論證中，國家化與全球化的進展下，當愈來愈多的區域被納入資本主義體系中，彼此間的生產關係也趨向於高度階層化，高度密集且集中的生產程序，成為資本與技術集中的製造業，因而技術成為資本累積的關鍵因素，至此中心與邊陲地區的發展關係更趨向兩極化。相反的，一個地區可藉由長期的努力，使其技術與資本達到積累，進而向上晉升。但是本文所探討的東石區域，在作為專業生產區的長期發展下，擁有相當程度的養殖技術，卻未能擺脫邊緣發展的命運，逐漸轉變為核心地區，而驗證了華勒斯坦的說法。　　　　處於資本主義市場區域剝削關係中的東石地區，在邊緣發展政策、超長與緊湊的高強度勞動工時、養蚵產業的固著、技術控制權難以掌握的因素下，失去了對資本的主控權力，造成養蚵逐漸成為邊緣的產業，東石變為邊陲的地區。故，停滯與貧窮在邊緣地區揮之不去，國家意識須有所介入之時，以邊緣地區為主要取向的研究議題，也需要更多的關注，來作為問題意識的背景。　　　The research is beginning from area development to probe into the development process in Tungshih .What kinds of “natural environment” , “humanity background”,”national policy” and “area cultural” insurances could make Tunesmith become a specialization production area. The connatural characteristic of oyster-cultivating industry in Tungshih,development out of kinds consciousness of production and labor militate local people action everyday.　　　　Under the Wallerstein’s argument, during the process of nation and globalization, more and more areas go into capitalism system. The production relation of areas tend to highly hierarchical, then the production process of highly congestion and central became industry of capital and technology. Thus, the development ration of core and peripheral tends to polarization. Inverse, an area could go ahead by hard endeavor to accumulate technology and capital. But, the example of Tungshih, under the specialization production area for long time development doesn’t out of peripheral development to be a core.　　　　Tungshih is in the area exploitation relation of capitalism market. Under of insurances “Policy of peripheral development”, “labor-times of longer and highly compass”, ”infelicity of oyster-cultivating industry”, and” out of technology control”,to loss power of capital control by itself,let oyster-cultivating industry became a peripheral industry and Tungshih became a peripheral area. So, peripheral areas don’t out of standstill and poverty, and when national- consciousness will intervene the issues study of peripheral area needs more and more careful to become the background of question consciousness.
Appears in Collections:	[Department of International and China Studies, The M.A. Program of Asia-Pacific Studies and Public Policy Studies] Disserations and Theses(M.A. Program in Public Policy Studies)

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
091NHU05054001-001.pdf		876Kb	Adobe PDF	108	View/Open
index.html		0Kb	HTML	199	View/Open

Loading...