| 摘要: | 江確立「詩」的「義界」是論詩的先決條件，歷代的文人論詩時所下的定義，因時代、地域、個人而有所不同，無論是從言志、具音樂性的文字、重情采詞藻的作品、具教化功能等各種角度切入，都有許多的思考。但各家或偏執於某端，或僅重視詩的功能，多未能全面地對種種問題進行精確的討論。而古典詩發展至明代，對於詩歌創作的觀念，趨向了復古與開新兩端。而西涯在此復古思潮中扮演著承先啟後的地位，且西涯言詩亦較為全面討論有關「詩」的種種問題，其近承滄浪之言、遠祖彥和之語，並融儒家詩教之說以救滄浪之弊；又言及「格調說」成為明清「格調派」理論的基礎；其言「詩在六經別為一教」，則將魏晉以來發展的「文筆之辨」的觀念，以「詩文之辨」作為最後總結，並肯定「臺閣體」的地位；又以「識先而力後」的工夫論孟子的「知言養氣」說作為文學創作的基礎工夫。可見西涯對於《詩經》的詩學詮釋在明代有著承先啟後的地位，並且建構的詩學論述也幾乎圍繞著「詩三百」的詮解而發。本文鑒於歷來對於李東陽與茶陵派詩觀的文章雖亦不少，但除了連文萍《明代茶陵派詩論研究》（1989 年東吳大學中文系碩士論文），以及柯惠馨《李東陽詩學理論研究》（2012 新竹教育大學中文系碩士論文）有全面性論述外，尚未有系統性的討論，也未有針對李東陽詮釋《詩經》的理論論述。故筆者便承繼過往對於元末明初地域詩學、臺閣體對《詩經》的詩學詮釋，進一步對西涯的《詩經》詮釋加以分析闡述，希望能對此論題有補綴之功。
T Establishment of ”poetry” of ”community justice” Poetry is a prerequisite, the definition of scholar on ancient poem next time, because of the times, geographic, personal and different, whether from ambition, a musical text, Emotion adopt various angles rhetoric works, with features such as cut enlightenment, there are many thinking. But each or paranoid certain end, or only pay attention to the function of poetry, more comprehensively failed to accurately discuss the problems. The development of classical poetry to the Ming Dynasty, for the concept of poetry, the trend of retro and new open at both ends. The West career playing in this retro trend in the past with the future status and the West Ya Yan poetry has a more comprehensive discussion of the various issues related to ”poetry”, which is close to bearing Changlang words, our ancient ancestors yin and language, and melt say Confucianists Poetry to save Changlang disadvantages; Speaking again, ”says style” became the basis of Ming and Qing ”style faction” theory; his words, ”the poem in six by another as a religion,” the idea, since the Wei and Jin will be the development of ”writing Distinction”, and with ”Distinction poetry” as a final conclusion, and certainly ”Taiwan Pavilion body” status; Youyi 'knowledge before and after the force, ”the effort of Mencius” Shanghai Museum raise gas, ”said the foundation as a literary work. West visible career for the ”Book of Songs” has a poetic interpretation of the past with the future status of the Ming Dynasty, and the construction is almost poetic discourse around Explanation of ”Three Hundred Poems” of hair. This paper has always given the outlook for Li Dongyang Poetry and send articles chaling although also a lot, but even apart from Bing Wen, ”the Ming Dynasty Poetry School chaling research” (1989 Soochow University Department of Master's thesis), and Ke Huixin ”Li Dongyang poetic theory research ”(2012 Hsinchu University Department of Education Master's thesis) has a comprehensive discussion, but yet there is a systematic discussion also not against Li Dongyang interpretation of” the Book of Songs ”theory discussed. Therefore, I will inherit the past for Yuanmomingchu geographical poetics, Taiwan Pavilion body on the ”Book of Songs” poetic interpretation, further west career of ”The Book of Songs” interpretation to be analyzed and discussed, hoping to have a patch of the power of this topic. |
