English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 18278/19583 (93%)
造訪人次 : 1024881      線上人數 : 937
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/21489


    題名: 圖書出版業者之經營策略與經營績效之相關性研究
    其他題名: The Study on the Relationship Between Managerial Strategy and Performance on Publisher Industry
    作者: 陸青美
    Lu, Ching-mei
    貢獻者: 出版事業管理研究所
    應立志
    Li-chih Ying
    關鍵詞: 經營策略;經營績效;平衡計分卡;圖書出版業
    management strategy;publisher industry;performance;balanced scorecard
    日期: 2004
    上傳時間: 2015-06-16 11:07:07 (UTC+8)
    摘要:   由於台灣圖書出版市場太小,再加上進入WTO,資本強大的集團業者紛紛加入,對台灣的圖書出版業者造成莫大的衝擊,為求生存必需尋求各種經營策略,以期達到良好的經營績效及生存發展空間。   本研究將圖書出版業的出版類別分為一般大眾書、專業工具書、教科書、考試用書、幼兒及兒童讀物、其他類等六種出版類別,以Miles & Snow (1978)之經營策略類型將各出版類別之圖書出版業者分為分析型、防禦型、前瞻型、反應型四種,再根據Kaplan & Norton(1990)提出之平衡計分卡(Balanced Scorecard)觀點,以財務、顧客、企業內部流程及學習成長四構面做為績效評估之工具,探究各出版類別之圖書出版業者採用不同經營策略之經營績效其差異為何?對各經營績效指標之重視程度其差異為何?又對經營績效指標之滿意程度其差異為何?資料分析工具使用卡方檢定、單因子變異數分析及Scheffe多重比較分析。    本研究所得結論如下:  1.圖書出版類型、經營策略與投資規模三者之間並無顯著差異。  2.出版一般大眾書與專業工具書,採用不同之經營策略,對經營績效指標之重視程度差異不顯著;出版其他類書採用不同之經營策略,對經營績效指標之重視程度無顯著差異;出版教科書與考試用書者,採用不同之經營策略,對經營績效指標之重視程度有顯著差異。  3.出版專業工具書者採用不同之經營策略,對經營績效指標之滿意程度無顯著差異;出版一般大眾書、教科書與考試用書、其他類者,採用不同之經營策略,對經營績效指標之滿意程度有顯著之差異。
      Due to the market share of books in Taiwan does not reach large scale and Taiwan has joined in WTO, the conglomerates come to the market one by one. That has impacted the publishing market in Taiwan significantly. To survive, the publishers have to look for various management strategy to achieve excellent performances.   This research classifies the publishers into six types, i.e. general public, references, textbooks, examination books, children readings and others. With the management strategy issued by Miles & Snow (1978), we group publishes into four types: analyzer, defender, prospector and reactor. And Kaplan & Norton’s Balanced Scorecard, which including financial perspectives, internal business process, innovation and learning, customer, is used to explore the differences in their management strategy by Chi-Square test and ANOVA.   Following are conclusions:  1.There is no significant difference between publishing types, management strategy and scale of investment.  2.Publishers of public books and references with distinct management strategy have no significant differences in emphasis of performances. It has the same result in publishing other books, but there are significant differences in textbooks and exam books.  3.Adopting different management strategy for publishing references has no significant differences in satisfaction of performance. But it has significant difference in publishing general public books, textbooks, exam books and others.
    顯示於類別:[文化創意事業管理學系] 博碩士論文-出版與文化事業管理研究所(停招)

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    092NHU05663002-001.pdf1076KbAdobe PDF159檢視/開啟
    index.html0KbHTML133檢視/開啟


    在NHUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋