我國大學校長職權之研究

南華大學機構典藏系統 > 社會科學院 > 國際事務與企業學系(亞太研究碩士班,公共政策研究碩士班,歐洲研究碩士班) > 博碩士論文-公共政策研究碩士班 > Item 987654321/21801

請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/21801

題名:	我國大學校長職權之研究
其他題名:	The Study of The University principal's authority
作者:	洪銓鍵 Hong, Chuan-Chein
貢獻者:	公共行政與政策研究所毛樹仁 Shuh-Ren Mao
關鍵詞:	大學法;董事會;學術自由;大學校長 University Law;University principal;Academic freedom;Board of directors
日期:	2005
上傳時間:	2015-07-02 16:51:37 (UTC+8)
摘要:	民國八十三年立法院通過大學法修正案，對於擺脫教育部束縛、保障學術自由、建立校內民主機制及落實大學自治等，具有重大意義；然實施之後由於校園初行民主、法規制定精神仍有不同見解及條文有部分疏漏，在大學校園產生一些流弊及問題。　　　公立大學與私立大學在面對校園問題上不盡相同，公立大學校長主要須面對的是與學術主管間的協調，各學院甚或系所之派系衝突時有所聞；私立大學則著重在董事會與校長間之關係，以及董事會之健全情況。　　　本論文研究發現，在公立大學中，校園的流弊與問題除了法律的見解不明，主要在於學術主管間的派系衝突，校長本身較難主導及掌握主動權；私立大學方面，除了大學法及私立學校法部分條文衝突，一般焦點主要放在董事會之營運狀況，或是在條文中解釋私立大學校長及校務會議之矛盾地位，卻忽略私立大學校長與董事會之間並無想像中的衝突，而學術領域較少出現公立大學之派系，並不表示優於公立大學，私立大學校長之權力實應有所限制，而最近修訂中之大學法似有開倒車之可能，宜多注意。　　1994, Legislative Yuan through the University Law, regarding gets rid of the Ministry of Education to fetter, in the safeguard academic freedom, the establishment school the democratic mechanism and the realization university autonomous and so on, has the great significance; After however implementation because at the beginning of the campus the good democracy, the laws and regulations formulation spirit still had the different opinion and the article has a part of oversight, had some prevalent abuses and the question in the university campus.　　The public university and the privately established university in face in the campus question isn’t quite the same, public university principal mainly must face is and coordination between the academic manager's, various institutes even are when the clique conflict has heard; Privately established university then emphatically in between board of directors and principal relations, as well as board of directors perfect situation.　　　Present paper research discovery, in public university, campus prevalent abuse and question except legal opinion unclear, mainly lies in clique conflict between the academic manager's, principal itself is more difficult to lead and to grasp the initiative; The privately established university aspect, except the University Law and the Private School Law partial articles conflict, the general focal point mainly puts transport business of condition on the board of directors, perhaps in the article explained privately established university principal and the school serve contradiction of status the conference, actually neglects between privately established university principal and the board of directors and does not have in the imagination the conflict, but the sphere of learning comparatively little appears clique of the public university, certainly did not indicate surpasses the public university, authority of the privately established university principal is solid should have the limit, but recently revised the big research method to there seems to be possibility of the back-draft, suitably much paid attention.
顯示於類別:	[國際事務與企業學系(亞太研究碩士班,公共政策研究碩士班,歐洲研究碩士班)] 博碩士論文-公共政策研究碩士班

文件中的檔案:

檔案	描述	大小	格式	瀏覽次數
093NHU05054003-001.pdf		565Kb	Adobe PDF	2092	檢視/開啟
index.html		0Kb	HTML	217	檢視/開啟

在NHUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

TAIR相關文章

資料載入中.....