本研究主要是由認知、滿意與看法及建議層面，來探討垃圾焚化廠回饋金運用現況及成效，並從民眾的看法與感受瞭解現有問題所在，尋求符合民眾需求且合理、適切之運用方向。利用分層隨機抽樣方式，發出446份，回收有效問卷401份，來分析民眾對回饋金之認知與運用方向之看法；並透過「實地訪談」瞭解個案回饋金運用現況與問題所在。 本研究發現國內都市垃圾焚化廠營運階段回饋金額度無計算基礎，若以環境權的角度來看，焚化廠回饋金係屬「補償」的行為。回饋金初期使用會以民眾企盼多時之公共設施興設用途為主，經過數年後，會漸漸轉以社會福利方面用途為主。經調查指出鹿草垃圾焚化廠僅有28.2%之受調查者表示非常滿意或滿意其居住村里回饋金使用情形，近47.1%的受調查者認為村里回饋金之使用決定，由村里民大會決定較佳，且大多數民眾願意參與村里回饋金之使用決定。在回饋金使用用途方面，分別有68.3﹪及55.4﹪之受調查者認為回饋金使用用途項目較宜者排行前二名為健康保險及環境美綠化；並分別有44.4﹪及35.4﹪之受調查者認為回饋金使用用途項目較不宜者排行前二名為餐會及摸彩與觀摩或旅遊活動。 This study is to discuss status quo and effect of the compensation application of a municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) from the aspects of cognition, satisfaction, opinion and suggestion, and realize present problem from the opinion and feeling of public to seek for the reasonable and appropriate application to conform to the need of public. The stratified random sampling is applied, and 401 valid questionnaires are returned out from 446 questionnaires to analyze public’s opinion on the cognition and application of compensation; and finally is to realize the status quo and problem of the compensation application by the case through “On-the-spot interview”. It is discovered that there is no computation basis for the amount of compensation in the business operation stage of MSWI in Taiwan. From the viewpoint of environment right, the compensation of MSWI is an “indemnifying” behavior. Compensation is initially used for public facilities, after several years, it will gradually turn to use in social welfare. It is shown from the survey that only 28.2% interviewees are very satisfied or satisfied with the compensation application in their villages; nearly 47.1% interviewees considered that the use of village compensation is better to be decided by village conference, and most of them are willing to participate the decision. As for the usage of compensation, there are 68.3% and 55.4% interviewees, respectively, considered health insurance and environment greening are the top two items for compensation; and 44.4% and 35.4% interviewees, respectively, considered dinner party and travel activity are the top two items that shall not use compensation.
