資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/22317
|
| 題名: | 中共和平崛起之研究 |
| 其他題名: | The Study of China's Peaceful Rise |
| 作者: | 江俊賢
Chiang, Chun-hsien |
| 貢獻者: | 亞太研究所
張亞中
Ya-chung Chang |
| 關鍵詞: | 非傳統安全;社會建構主義;制度自由主義;防禦型現實主義;和平崛起;中共
institutional liberalism;peaceful rise;defensive realism;nontraditional security;China;social constructivism |
| 日期: | 2006 |
| 上傳時間: | 2015-08-04 10:31:35 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 本文探討中共「和平崛起」內容與可行性。本文試以國際關係三個理論－防禦型現實主義、制度自由主義、社會建構主義－來分析「和平崛起」的內容。防禦型結構現實主義者認為，中共將加強軍事現代化，著重防禦型國防，傾向世界多極化；制度自由主義者認為，中共將加強內部平衡發展，著重非傳統安全，深化東亞經濟整合；社會建構主義者認為，中共將時代界定為「和平與發展」，定位負責任大國角色，建立和平形象。 本文試以美國、歐盟、俄羅斯、日本、東協等觀察其他國家對中共「和平崛起」的反應。美國可以接受，但是會要求中共在現有體制下崛起；歐盟樂於看見，但是也希望中共能融入西方價值體系當中；日本視中共是挑戰大於機會，雙方最大的衝突在於東亞領導權之爭與歷史問題；俄羅斯是害怕多過於期待，擔心中共在自己周邊建立勢力；東協與中共有良性互動，但東協仍然存在長遠的擔憂。 本文發現，中共未來將不斷地朝和平崛起的方向邁進。雖然還有若干問題仍未解決，但這些問題並不會改變中共和平崛起的進程。「和平崛起」仍有待中共持續地實踐，中共領導人必須思考其不斷擴張的影響力將如何促進區域與全球的穩定。不論中共宣稱自己多麼愛好和平，決策者也應關注到亞洲鄰國與其他國家合理的擔憂。
This article discusses about the content and feasibility of China’s “peaceful rise.” In this article, it uses three types of international relationship theories: defensive realism, institutional liberalism, and social constructivism, to analysis the content of “peaceful rise.” Defensive realists believe that China should strengthen and modernize their military, defensive national defense, and toward multi-polar world; institutional liberalists in another way feel that China should further enhance on their internal balance development, nontraditional security, and integrate into the economic of East Asia; social constructivists put “peaceful rise” as China should change into a modernize country with “Peace and Development” as the dominant themes in mind, setting a responsible role as one of the biggest country in the world and establish a peaceful image. In this article, it mainly describes on how America, European Union, Russia, Japan and AESAN s’ reactions toward China’s “peaceful rise.” With the acceptance of China’s “peaceful rise” by America, America will still require China to rise under the present international system. European Union is pleased to see China’s “peaceful rise” but hope that China can integrate into the western system. In the point of view of Japan in China’s “peaceful rise”, it will be the biggest challenge between both countries than an opportunity in proving their relationship. The prominent conflict between Japan and China is the competition in the East Asia leadership and the historical problems. As for Russia, it sees China’s “peaceful rise” as a fear more than a hope. Russia worries China will establish its power in Russia. In due of the good relationship between ASEAN and China, ASEAN still need to have long-term worries in China development. This article evaluates that China will forged ahead continuously. Although there are still some problems had not been solved, but it does not alter China in the process of peaceful rise. Regardless of how China establish the “peaceful rise”, the policy makers should take into due consideration on how it will affect Asia countries’ reactions and worries.Keywords: peaceful rise, defensive realism, institutional liberalism, social constructivism, nontraditional security, China |
| 顯示於類別: | [國際事務與企業學系(亞太研究碩士班,公共政策研究碩士班,歐洲研究碩士班)] 博碩士論文-亞太研究碩士班
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
描述 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| 094NHU05664007-001.pdf | | 2391Kb | Adobe PDF | 513 | 檢視/開啟 | | index.html | | 0Kb | HTML | 394 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在NHUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
