南華大學機構典藏系統:Item 987654321/22560
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18278/19583 (93%)
Visitors : 1032183      Online Users : 4064
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/22560


    Title: 訓練評估之研究-以空軍航空技術學院為例
    Other Titles: THE STUDY ON TRAINING EVALUATION OF THE AIR FORCE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
    Authors: 馮業達
    Feng, Yeh-dar
    Contributors: 管理科學研究所
    鍾國貴
    Kuo-kuei Chung
    Keywords: Kirkpatrick模式;訓練成效;訓練評估
    Kirkpatrick model;training effect;training evaluation
    Date: 2006
    Issue Date: 2015-08-04 15:44:40 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   本研究主旨在探討Kirkpatrick 訓練評估模式的「學習」、「反應」及「行為」等三項構面,歸納出訓練評估之變數,並經由因素分析、差異分析及單因子變異數分析及檢定得知空軍航空技術學院訓練評估之關鍵因素及了解國軍軍事校院畢業生於派職前接受空軍航空技術學院訓練課程後之滿意度及工作行為改變等情況。本研究探討發現如下:   1.訓練評估之構面可分為訓練實施執行-反應層次、訓練學習成果-學習層次、工作行為改變-行為層次等三個構面;其關鍵因素為:(1) 訓練師資的安排;(2) 訓練課程的安排;(3) 訓練實施後行為或感受改變程度;(4) 考評方式的設計;(5) 訓期及訓練人數的安排;(6) 學員自我努力的程度等六項。  2.針對訓練實施執行、訓練學習成果及工作行為改變等三構面上,發現「其他校院或年班畢業」、「接受航行管制專業訓練」及「分發海軍任職學員」等人口統計變數,對訓練整體滿意度,與其它變數有顯著差異。  3.對訓練評估的項目滿意度,以訓練師資的相關者較為滿意,對課程內容實用性、課程時數分配及教學設備配合度較不滿意。
      This study aims at discussing the three aspects of "learning", "reaction", and "behavior" of the Kirkpatrick training evaluation model to induce the variables for training evaluation, and through statistical analysis and testing to figure out the key factors for training evaluation of the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT), understand the graduates' satisfactory level on AFIT's training courses before they are assigned for active duty, and how their working behavior change as well. Through this study, I found that  1. Training evaluation can be divided into three aspects. There are training implementation aspect – reaction level, training & learning achievement – learning level , and change on working behavior – behavior level; the key factors are a. The selection of training facultiesb. The arrangement training courses.c. after implementation, the change level on behavior and perception.d. The design of evaluation methods.e. The arrangement of training duration and the amount of trainees. f. Diligent level of the trainees   2. For training implementation, traing & learing achivement, and change on working behavior, I found that the satisfactory level of trainees of other military academies, receiving air traffic control training, and assigned to naval are different than other categories.   3. For the satisfactory level on training effect evaluation those pertaining to training faculties are higher. On the other hand, the satisfactory level on the practical content, class hours, and educational facilities are lower.
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Business Administration, Master/Ph.D Program in Management Sciences] Disserations and Theses(Master and Doctoral Program in Management Sciences)

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    094NHU05457033-001.pdf794KbAdobe PDF25View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML203View/Open


    All items in NHUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback