本研究要旨在探討科技時代的今日，人際交往中意義理解的問題受到科技理性的掌控下，逐漸地顯露出語言在理解問題上的重要性。維根斯坦的語言分析哲學便是在這種歷史情境中逐漸發展的哲學理論。語言學轉向後，高達美藉助於語言遊戲理論來中介理解活動已顯現自我反思中的世界經驗建構哲學詮釋學；而哈伯瑪斯則以普遍語用學作為道德規範的奠基，重構意義理解為共識形成的結果。突顯出語言在自身與他人交往中的倫理性，迫使我們重新檢視「實踐」的問題如何在當代為我們所溫故知新。 因此，本研究藉由哈伯瑪斯與高達美之間的論爭觀點，重新加以解讀兩者之間的觀點差異外，語言問題的提出後對於哈伯瑪斯的對話倫理學與高達美的哲學詮釋學的發展構想中，兩者在「倫理觀」上的概念差異，藉此突顯出人際交往行為中「對話」關係在當前倫理學研究上的重要性。 The purpose of this study is to discuss the importance of language in comprehension gradually shown by the problem of meaning comprehension in interpersonal relationship under the control of technological rationality. Wittgenstein’s linguistic philosophy was developed under such historical scenario. After the change of direction of linguistics, Gadamer, Hans-Georg used linguistic game theory to mediate show the comprehension activity has shown the philosophical hermeneutics constructed by world experience in self-reflection. Jürgen Habermas used universal pragmatics as the basis for moral norms, and reconstructed the meaning comprehension to be the outcome of consensus forming. The highlighted morality of language in the relationship forced us to review how the problem of “practice” gained new insights in the present days. Therefore, this study, based on the argument between Jürgen Habermas and Gadamer, Hans-Georg reinterpreted the different perspectives of the two, as well as their differences of opinion on “morality” based on Habermas’ ethics of dialogue and Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, in order to highlight the importance of “dialogue” of interpersonal relationship in the current moral philosophy.
