| 摘要: | 檢視中、外的社會發展史，「公共藝術」其實存在於每一個時代，但它不屬於藝術史上的任何一種主義、運動或固定的藝術形式或流派，而比較是一種概念，隨著文化思潮、政治策略、社會需求而呈現不同的風貌。本文從「公共藝術」和「城市空間美學」的概念入手，提出一系列『歷史發展』、『都市脈絡』取向的問題。 首先，自1992年以來，文建會頒布的「文化藝術獎助條例」，公共藝術即開始受到國內學者及相關人士的廣泛討論和推動。作者以此論文，期望藉由相關基礎理論的建構及公共藝術研究案例的實地調查結果作整理，企圖釐清在觀念界定上的混淆，而能提供一個實踐過程中的依循與操作方法，以作為國內日後公共藝術推展參考的基礎。另外，本文通過不同角度和實情的闡釋，以期協助公共藝術的觀念和實踐在我國當代社會中的傳播和進一步推廣。本文以高雄市為例；高雄市文化中心週邊的「市民藝術大道」、中華路與五福路交接的「城市光廊」、「愛河兩岸」，是民眾休閒、藝術表演的公共空間，成為最具代表性的公共藝術典範。作為個案研究對象。 比較詳細地分析了當代公共藝術與城市空間美學的相互關係，及「高雄市公共藝術基金委員會」設置的方式做為其他城市未來都市化中『公共藝術設置』發展提出了一些可供借鑒的指導方案。本研究的結論 （一）、公共藝術影響了高雄市城市空間美學風格的發展與都市建築的改變。 （二）、城市空間風格是民眾文化藝術品味的方針。 （三）、以公共藝術的形式帶動經過或進入此空間，進而增進人與人之間產生溝通與交流，活化都市空間。 （四）、「高雄市公共藝術基金委員會」的設立，確實可為各都市公共藝術發展的運作準則。
In the history of social development in Taiwan and abroad, public art exists in all periods of time. However, it does not belong to a particular ism, movement, or fixed art form or school in the art history, but a concept that exhibits different images along with the change of cultural thoughts, political strategies, and social demands. This paper proposes a series of questions derived from historical development and urban context based on the concepts of “public art” and “urban space aesthetics”. First, since the Council of Cultural Affairs announced the “Regulations for Cultural Art Rewards and Subsidies” in 1992, public art has been widely discussed and promoted by domestic scholars and related personnel. This paper intends to organize the fundamental principles and investigative results on case studies of public art,thus clarifying the definition of concepts and providing a method and means in the process of practice. Therefore it can be served as the foundation for promoting public art in the future. Also, through different angles and interpretations, this paper aims to assist the dissemination and promotion of the concepts and practices of public art in the modern society of Taiwan. This study took Kaohsiung City as an example, and studied “Citizen Art Boulevard” next to Kaohsiung City Cultural Center, “Urban Spotlight” at the intersection of Jhunghua Road and Wufu Road, and 〝banks of Love River〞, which are representative models of public art for they are the public recreational and performance space accessible to all citizens. This study analyzed the interactive relationship between modern public art and urban space in details, and based on the installation approach adopted by Kaohsiung City Public Art Foundation Committee. It proposed guidelines on public art installation in other cities for future urbanization. The conclusions are as follow: (1) Public art affects the development of aesthetic style of Kaohsiung City`s urban space, and changes the urban architectures. (2) The style of urban space is the guiding point for the taste of public art. (3) Using public art form to bring people by or into the space can enhance the communication and exchange of people and activate the urban space. (4) The establishment of the “Kaohsiung City Public Art Foundation Committee” can be served as the operating principle for urban public art development. |
