2011年日本外海發生規模9.0的大地震，伴隨地震而來的海嘯侵襲造成位於福島的核電廠受損洩漏輻射。日本的這次核災連帶引起臺灣的反核聲浪，排山倒海的壓力最終也終於迫使政府將核四封存，留待日後再決定是否運轉。然而，此次核災所造成的立即損害遠遠不如地震、海嘯所直接造成的，為何臺灣的輿論是談核色變，卻對更具破壞力的海嘯與地震無動於衷呢？固然，輻射外洩真正的危險是長期的健康損害，但是與輻射比較起來，不健康的飲食與生活習慣，導致的損害卻更大得多，臺灣的輿論為何又不在乎呢？更啟人疑竇的是，臺灣反核輿論的高峰，並不在2011年當年而是在三年之後，這又是為什麼呢？究竟臺灣輿論為何會反核？這是本研究欲探究的問題。對此，本研究主張，臺灣的反核聲浪其實是出於資訊的不足，且受到政治意識型態的操弄。在有更多資訊且不受政治意識型態影響的情況下，臺灣反核的輿論會有所改變。 In 2011, the 9.0 on the Richter scale earthquake happened off the coast of Japan. Afterwards, a tsunami triggered by the earthquake. The tsunami destroyed the nuclear power plant in Fukushima and it made the radiation leak. Because of the nuclear disaster in Japan, Taiwan's anti-nuclear voices are getting louder; overwhelming pressure eventually forced the government to seal off the nuclear power plant, and make the decision after. However, the immediate damage caused by the nuclear disaster is much less than earthquakes and tsunamis did. But why the public opinion in Taiwan is to talk about nuclear discoloration, and is indifferent to the more destructive of tsunami and earthquake? Of course, the real danger of radiation leakage is the long-term health damage, but compare with the radiation, unhealthy diet and lifestyle is more damage. Why is the public opinion in Taiwan not to care about it? More than a puzzle is, the peak of Taiwan's Anti-nuclear Public Opinion is not in 2011 but in the three years later, and what is it? Why exactly is the Anti-nuclear Public Opinion in Taiwan? This is the research to explore and investigate the questions. In this regard, the study claims that Taiwan's anti-nuclear voices are the cause of insufficient and get less information and be manipulated by political ideologies. In the case of more information and free from political influence patterns of consciousness, the Taiwan Anti-nuclear Public Opinion will be changed.
