南華大學機構典藏系統:Item 987654321/23705
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18278/19583 (93%)
Visitors : 1024694      Online Users : 761
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/23705


    Title: 自主與依賴:比較反核四運動與反美濃水庫運動中的政治交換模式
    Other Titles: Autonomy and Dependency: Kongliao anti-nuclear movement and Meinung anti-dam movement to construct two ideal types in political exchange
    Authors: 何明修;Ho, Ming-sho
    Contributors: 應用社會學系
    Keywords: 社會運動;政治交換;政黨;運動資源;自主性;Social movement;political exchange;political party;movement resource;autonomy
    Date: 2003-06
    Issue Date: 2015-12-23 14:21:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 社運組織的重要任務之一,即是將累積的社會力轉化成為政治力。要達成這個目的,社會運動需要在既有的政治勢力中尋找聯盟者,以建立一套政治交換關係。本文分析美濃反水庫運動與貢寮反核四運動之個案,試圖建議政治交換關係的自主與依賴的理念類型。在自主的情境之下,社運組織較有能力獨立設定自己的策略,而不受到聯盟政黨的限制。相對地,依賴的社會運動則是處於一種不對等的情境中,沒有具有自行擴張與實現目標的能力。本研究試圖提出一套因果解釋的架構,分析自主與依賴的形成過程。(1) 社會運動的起源,(2) 社會組織所掌獲的資源,此兩項因素是具有關鍵性的。另一方面,不同政治交換關係也表現在動員框架的差異。最後,本文將要重新思考社會運動自主性的意義。
    Among the tasks of social movement organizations, to transform the accumulated social support into political force is critical. To reach this goal, social movement has to find an established political ally and to build a workable relation of political exchange. This essay analyzes Meinung anti-dam movement and Kongliao anti-nuclear movement in order to construct two ideal types in political exchange, i.e., autonomy and dependency. Asocial movement is autonomous insofar it can independently decide its strategy with little constraint from the allied party. A dependent movement, on the contrary, faces an unequal relation and does not possess the capacity to expand and realize the goal by its own strength. This essay tries to present a causal explanation for the different political exchange types. Two factors, the origin of social movement and the resources of social movement organization, turn out to be explanatory. Different types of political exchange are also manifest in mobilization frames. In the end, this essay further reflects on the significance of movement autonomy.
    Relation: 臺灣社會學刊
    30 期
    pp.1-49
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Applied Sociology, The M.A. Program of Sociology] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    自主與依賴.pdf3563KbAdobe PDF240View/Open


    All items in NHUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback