English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 18278/19583 (93%)
造訪人次 : 1023298      線上人數 : 326
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/23839


    題名: 觀光與日常飲食碳足跡探討
    其他題名: The Study of the Carbon Footprint in food Management in Tourism and Daily Life
    作者: 許澤宇;王姝丹;楊惠玲
    Hsui, Che-Yu;Wang, Su-Tan;Yang, Hui-Ling
    貢獻者: 南華大學旅遊管理學系;南華大學旅遊管理學系;山腳蛙企業社
    Graduate Institute of Tourism Management, Nanhua University;Graduate Institute of Tourism Management, Nanhua University;shanjiaowa company
    關鍵詞: 食物里程;碳足跡;碳排放;低碳飲食
    food miles;carbon footprint;carbon emission;low-carbon diet
    日期: 2015-12-01
    上傳時間: 2016-04-15
    出版者: 南華大學旅遊管理學系休閒環境管理碩士班
    摘要: 民以食為天,但我們甚少去了解日常所食之食材種類、來源、採購及運輸方式,究竟對環境造成多少二氧化碳排放量。因此本研究透過70位消費者,實際調查其日常及旅遊過程之飲食資料,包含菜單、食材重量及食材來源,配合廣泛蒐集之文獻碳排放量資料庫,計算其溫室氣體潛勢。研究結果顯示食用進口食材將使碳排放量大增,而日常飲食之葷素碳排放量沒有顯著差異,但觀光過程葷食者之碳排放量則顯著高於素食者。推測素食者日常生活易選擇加工素料為食材,故易提高其二氧化碳排放。另外葷食者於外出觀光旅行時對飲食具有追求特別、高級之趨勢,估算約有二成五之餐食與進口食材有關。反之素食者因外出觀光旅行時則因餐館選擇性不多,反而使得飲食之選擇傾向以蔬食為主,故於觀光過程葷素二者之碳排放量有顯著差異,有別於日常飲食。本研究之重要發現為:由於觀光過程葷食族群之飲食碳排放量顯著高於日常飲食,因此若以低碳為目標,建議遊程應多提倡深度旅遊及品嘗在地風味飲食,將有助於減碳。
    Food is the basic need of man, but we seldom fully understand what our food is, where it comes from, how it is purchased, and how much carbon dioxide it emits when produced or transported.Therefore, this study conducted on 70 consumers, launching an investigation into the diet they eat not only in daily life but alsoduring a trip, including what the food is, how much it weighs, and where it comes from. In addition to collecting the data of carbon dioxide emissions from lots of documents, this research makes further efforts to calculate their global warming potential. The result shows that there will be more carbon dioxide emissions if more imported foods reach the dinner table. About 25% of the meal eaten during a trip comes from another country. In terms of the meal eaten in daily life, a vegetarian diet and a non-vegetarian one make little difference in carbon emission; in terms of the meal eaten during a trip, a non-vegetarian diet emits much more carbon dioxide than a vegetarian one. In daily life, the emission of carbon dioxide has no significant difference between vegetarianand non-vegetarian; but during a trip, non-vegetarian is significantly higher than vegetarian.The reasons might include when taking a trip, a non-vegetarian is supposed to indulge himself and, therefore, tends to eat something special or luxurious; as for a vegetarian, they cannot but eat light, because there are fewer restaurants for him to choose from. On the contrary, a vegetarian tends to eat processed vegetarian food in their daily life.Based on the findings of this study, for non-vegetarians, in-depth travel and local-flavor foods are suggested, and for vegetarians, eating non-manufactured food can help reduce carbon emission.
    關聯: 環境與管理研究
    16卷2期
    顯示於類別:[本校期刊] 環境與管理研究
    [旅遊管理學系(旅遊管理碩士班)] 環境與管理研究

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    3042160204.pdf1306KbAdobe PDF1412檢視/開啟
    index.html0KbHTML527檢視/開啟


    在NHUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋