摘要: | 本研究旨在了解嘉義縣國小教職員工對工作生活品質與工作績效之現況。 探討個人屬性在工作生活品質與工作績效之差異性,以及工作生活品質與工作績效之相關情形。以嘉義縣國小350位教職員工為研究樣本,並以問卷調查法蒐集資料,共回收330份有效問卷;將這些問卷所得之資料採用SPSS中文版的電腦統計套裝軟體進行統計分析,藉由描述性統計分析、獨立樣本t、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關分析等方法分析樣本。根據資料分析之後,結果發現:(1)國小教職員工對整體工作生活品質知覺達中等程度。 各因素中以「個人層面」最佳,其次為「組織層面」,以「工作層面」最低。(2)國小教職員工對整體工作績效表示認同。 各構面中以「適應性績效」分數最高,其次為「任務性績效」,以「脈絡性績效」最低。(3)不同背景屬性之國小教職員工對工作生活品質知覺之差異情形,其中性別與職務兩項具有顯著差異存在。(4)不同背景屬性之國小教職員工對工作績效程度之差異情形,以性別、職務及薪資等三項具有顯著差異存在。(5)教職員工之工作生活品質與工作績效間均具正相關性。 本研究針對上述研究結果,提出若干建議,以供教職員工、教育主管及未來研究者之參考。 The purpose of this study is to investigate the current situation of working life quality and job performance of faculty in primary schools in Chia-yi County. It focuses on the difference between working life quality and job performance in terms of persona attribute. Questionnaire survey was applied, and the study was conducted by 350 faculty in primary schools in Chiayi with 330 responses were received. The questionnaire was analyzed by SPSS software with the methods of descriptive statistics, independent samples t, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson product-moment correlation, etc. The findings of the study as follows. First, the perception of faculty on the working life quality reach the medium degree overall. Among these factors, personal level gets the highest degree, and the next is the organization level. Final one is the working level. Second, the faculty express the approval to the job performance. Among all aspects, adaptive performance gets the highest degree, and the next is the task performance. Final one is the contextual performance. Third, the faculty with different background result in different perception of the working life quality, particularly on the gender and job parts. Forth, the faculty with different background differ in the job performance, particularly on the gender, job and payroll. Fifth, there is positive correlation between the working life quality and job performance. According to the above-mentioned, some suggestions are given as the references for faculty, educational managers and researchers. |