English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 18278/19583 (93%)
造訪人次 : 1024887      線上人數 : 653
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/26464


    題名: 性侵害加害人評估小組委員評估結案決意之研究
    其他題名: The Research on the Determination of the Case Closure of Estimation by Sexual Offenders' Assessment Committeemen
    作者: 謝馥如
    HSIEH, FU-JU
    貢獻者: 生死學系碩士班
    林原賢
    LIN, YUAN-HSIEN
    關鍵詞: 性侵害加害人;評估委員;再犯;決意;處遇
    sexual offenders;examination committeemen;recidivism;determination;treatment
    日期: 2018
    上傳時間: 2018-12-18 17:03:53 (UTC+8)
    摘要:   本研究目的針對以下三點進行探討:一、性侵害加害人評估委員對於加害人結案之流程評估與探討,二、、性侵害加害人評估委員對於評估結案壓力之調適,三、性侵害加害人評估委員對於性侵害加害人結案所關切之議題與焦點探討。本研究受訪對象為六位性侵害評估委員,運用深度訪談法及內容分析法進行資料研究,以了解委員對性侵害評估結案決意之相關見解。  研究結果:一、評估委員與性侵害治療師對於性罪犯是否結案若出現認知上的差異,會先採用共同討論的方式尋求共識,若仍無法達成共識且存在異議,則多半以繼續治療為優先指導原則,以減少性侵害再犯的疑慮,二、評估委員需得到治療師對個案結案之充分理由方行決案,而非治療師主觀上的評判就予以採納,三、評估委員會議採共識決意見,除了可以增加評估委員會對個案結案決意評估之公正性及專業性外,亦可降低委員結案的壓力,四、評估結案決意的關切因素包含以下十一點:(一)加害人是否可能再犯,(二)治療師是否向評估委員提供充分之結案理由,而非主觀性評判,(三)加害人量表分數是否夠客觀,(四)加害人生活規範是否有變好,(五)加害人是不是有穩固的工作,(六)加害人是否具穩固的親密關係,(七)加害人在性方面是否有合理合法的解決管道,(八)加害人是否有接近被害人的可能性,(九)加害人是否有自我控制性的能力,(十)加害人是否有家人的支持,(十一)加害人是否有良好的生活環境等要素。  研究結論:評估委員評估結案決意之要項,重點在於評估加害者性侵害再犯的可能性,意即性侵害再犯率是評估結案決意的最重要因素。因此,整體保安制度的完整與落實、加害人家庭功能的健全、「性」除罪化觀念的建立、性專區的落實及當事人人際關係建立之好壞都將會是性侵害案發生率及再犯率減少的具體作為。
      To decide whether to do treatment or case clousure for sexual offenders are under the professional estimations of the "Sexual Offenders' Assessment Committee". The inapposite estimation and improper treatment maybe result in social security loopholes in our country. The purpose of this study is to explore the following points: (1) To discuss the concern of process that the case closure of sexual offenders of estimation by sexual offenders' assessment committeemen (2) How to adjust the pressure on the estimation of the case closure by Sexual Offenders' Assessment Committeemen. (3) To discuss the concern that case closure of sexual offenders of estimation by sexual offenders' assessment committeemen. The study respondents were six members of sexual abuse assessment, the use of in-depth interview and content analysis of data research to understand members of the sexual aggression assessment concluded the resolution of the relevant views.  The result show that: (1) committeemen and sexual assault therapists for sexual offenders are closed if there are cognitive differences, will first use the common discussion to seek consensus, if still unable to reach a consensus and there are objections, most of the continued treatment as give priority to guiding principles to reduce the suspicion of sexual assault and re-conviction, (2) appraisal members need to get the full justification of the case conclusion by the therapist, not the subjective judgment of the therapist, (3) the appraisal committee adopts consensus In addition to increasing the impartiality and professionalism of the assessment committees in assessing the resolution of cases, they can also reduce the pressure on commissioners to conclude cases, (4) the factors of concern in assessing the resolution of a settlement include the following eleven questions: (1) Does offenders likely to repeat the criminal act? (2) Whether the therapist provides the appraisal committee with sufficient reasons for the case, not the subjective judgment, (3) Whether the scam score is objective enough, (4) Whether the norms of the perpetrator have become better or not, (5) whether the offender have solid work, (6) Whether the perpetrators have a solid relationship, (7)Whether the perpetrators in terms of sexuality reasonable and legal solution to the pipeline, (8) The possibility of the perpetrator approaching the victim, (9) Whether the offender has self-control ability, (10) Whether the offender has the support of his family, and (11) whether the offender has a good life environment and other factors.  Conclusion of that, committeemen evaluate the key elements of the resolution, with the emphasis on assessing the possibility of recidivism of sexual offender, which means that the rate of recidivism of sexual offender is the most important factor in assessing the resolution. Therefore, the integrity and implementation of the overall security system, the perfection of the family functions of the offenders, the establishment of the concept of "sexual" decriminalization, the implementation of the prefecture-level special areas and the establishment of the interpersonal relationships between the parties will all be the incidence of sexual offender and recidivism specific rate of reduction as.
    顯示於類別:[生死學系(生死學系碩士班,哲學與生命教育碩士班)] 博碩士論文-生死學系碩士班

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    106NHU00672005-002.pdf1864KbAdobe PDF2150檢視/開啟
    index.html0KbHTML220檢視/開啟


    在NHUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋