資料載入中.....
|
請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件:
http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/26641
|
| 題名: | 臺灣廢除死刑政策之研究 |
| 其他題名: | A Study on Policy of Abolition of the Death Penalty in Taiwan |
| 作者: | 洪良德
HUNG, LIANG-TE |
| 貢獻者: | 國際事務與企業學系公共政策研究碩士班
劉華宗
LIU, HUA-TSUNG |
| 關鍵詞: | 國際趨勢;人權公約;死刑制度;死刑存廢;死刑
International Trends;Capital Punishment Debate;Human Rights Covenants;Death Penalty System;Death Penalty |
| 日期: | 2018 |
| 上傳時間: | 2018-12-20 17:05:13 (UTC+8) |
| 摘要: | 死刑為生命刑，即剝奪犯罪人的生命，使之與社會永久隔離的刑罰。我國自1987年解除戒嚴以來，學者、律師、民間團體逐漸對死刑制度提出檢討，甚至要求對死囚個案停止執行死刑，可見死刑存廢制度已備受世界各國重視。 贊成廢除死刑的人認為，廢除死刑是人道主義的終極關懷，任何人都沒有剝奪他人生命的權力，即使是國家機器；不贊成廢除死刑的人認為，對於罪大惡極的犯罪人，為實現正義，必須處以死刑，始能平息及滿足被害人或其遺族的心理。 本文以法律上廢止死刑為我國追求的目標，並從國際、人道、案例、社會、宗教、法律等六個不同面向來談論廢除死刑與否，期望能勾勒我國廢止死刑之願景並提出建議。 本研究發現如下：一、死刑是將犯罪行為全歸咎於犯罪本人，卻忽略社會、家庭、學校等的責任： 許多犯罪者經常是社會弱勢族群，因為人總是被社會環境影響，並不是每個人都有完全自由的理性能力，來選擇服從法律與否。二、執行死刑要慎重： 檢察官考量是純法律面，法務部則是要做綜合性考量；檢察官不用考量跟人權公約的關聯度，法務部則需要考量人權公約相關問題。三、罪與刑是兩個不同的概念： 刑罰可以改判，死人卻不能復生。廢除死刑，不代表犯的罪責完全不被追究，只是排除「以命還命」的這種等價思維，而改以其他重刑來判。四、司法誤判，可能導致殘害無辜： 雖然無法直接明確指出誤判和冤殺與死刑有直接關係，但不可否認的是，法官和檢察官在審判和調查時，也有可能是錯誤、有問題的。
Death Penalty, which also called capital punishment, is the punishment that deprives offenders' right to live and separate them from society. Since declaring martial law ended in 1987, Scholars, lawyers and NGO (non-governmental organization) come up for discussion about Death Penalty, even ask to abolish the death penalty; thus we can know that the issue has been gradually emphasized by the countries of the world. The ones for abolishing of the death penalty considers that no one can deprive any other's right to live, even state apparatus, abolition of the death penalty is the ultimate concern of Humanism.However, the ones who against thinks that in order to achieve justice, those worst criminal should be carried out death penalty; it is also the way to appeased the victims and their bereaved family. Abolition of the death penalty legally is our country's goal. In this article, we would discuss that should the death penalty be abolished or not in six different way including International, Humanism, Case, Society, Religion and Law and hope to outline the vision of abolition of the death penalty and to make the suggestion. The research discover is as follows: 1.Death penalty only blames on criminal but ignores the responsibility of society,family and school: Most criminal comes from Underprivileged Groups. They are deeply influenced by social environment and have no enough rational ability to choose to obey the law.2.To administrate the death penalty should adopt a cautious attitude: Prosecutor's consideration based on law, they don't need to consider the human rights conventions for criminal; however, Ministry of Justice needs to consider comprehensively, including the criminal's right.3.Crime and penalty are in two different concepts: Penalty can be commuted; however, the dead can't be brought back to life. To abolish the death penalty doesn't mean not to hold the criminal liable for their crime. It means to get rid of the thinking of life for life, and punish the criminal with other heavy penalty.4.Miscarriage of justice may cause the innocent person to be executed or Die: Though, there's no direct relationship between miscarriage of justice and death penalty, but it can't be deny that there might be the mistake in the judge's trail and prosecutor's investigation. |
| 顯示於類別: | [國際事務與企業學系(亞太研究碩士班,公共政策研究碩士班,歐洲研究碩士班)] 博碩士論文-公共政策研究碩士班
|
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 |
描述 |
大小 | 格式 | 瀏覽次數 |
|---|
| 106NHU00025007-001.pdf | | 1518Kb | Adobe PDF | 2035 | 檢視/開啟 | | index.html | | 0Kb | HTML | 271 | 檢視/開啟 |
|
在NHUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.
|
