兩岸關係在2019年初中共啟動一國兩制台灣方案起已陷嚴峻，我國也應能提出新對策。筆者以兩千五百年前戰國亂世下墨子提出兼愛非攻之和平戰略對照各家並研析，發現墨家兼愛和平論述、名分論述、與兵學戰術均甚為可取。研究發現兩岸糾結關鍵在於儒家的名分說，而兩岸政府與人民卻都聲稱傳承儒家的仁愛，但墨子早已看出信儒家將有名分糾結而紛亂四起的結果。一方或兩岸人民與政府若能改倡兼愛非攻，尊墨子為和平先師，方能有兩岸永久和平。 Cross-Strait Relationship became harder, since the Red China la the One-China-Two-System-Taiwan-Project at early 2019. ROC should have its own new strategy after that. The author analyzed the Universal Love and Non-attack proposed by Mozi under the chaosof the Warring States Period of 2,500 years ago with comparing important peace theories and strategies in the world. It is found that the Mohist peace discourse, identity discourse, and military tactics were all very desirable. It is also found that the most critical key to cross-strait entanglement lies in the theory of Confucian identity, while the government and people cross the strait claim to inherit the benevolence of Confucianism. Mozi has foreseen that Confucianism should cause tangled identity and chaos everywhere. Once the people and the government cross the strait or one-side can promote Universal Love and Non-attack, and respect for Mozi as the prince of peace, there may be permanent peace across the Taiwan Straits.
