依據刑事訴訟程序對犯罪嫌疑人進行審查和決定時，人權會受到嚴重侵犯，而《蒙古刑事訴訟法》並未包括涉嫌犯罪的嫌疑人的權利和責任，以及考慮他/她是犯罪嫌疑人的理由。因此，本研究主題是為消除這種因法律缺漏而對人權造成了侵害。 本研究首先強調考慮作為犯罪嫌疑人和犯罪嫌疑人證詞的理由，在執行刑事訴訟程序中是否具有證據的重要性 ; 其次，證人提供的犯罪嫌疑人的證詞是否在刑事訴訟程序中有所遺漏，以及犯罪嫌疑人權利和義務是否侵犯人權。為了進行這項研究，根據其他國家以及蒙古根據國際條約提供的刑法、法律程序、法律規定和統計資料，對犯罪嫌疑人或證人的概念進行了質性研究。最後，本研究建議有必要將反映犯罪嫌疑人的權利和責任的法規納入《刑事訴訟法》，以消除目前法律的缺漏。 The human right is being violated seriously when the suspect is examined and settled in accordance with the criminal procedure while the Criminal Procedure Code of Mongolia does not include the right and responsibility of the suspect who was suspected in the crime as well as the justification for considering him/her as a suspect of crime. Therefore, the subject was chosen for the contribution of elimination this violation. This work addresses if the grounds for considering as a suspect and testimony of suspects have the significance of evidence in executing criminal procedure or not, whether the testimony of suspect from a witness is an omission in criminal procedure or not, and whether contradiction of the suspect's rights and obligations are human right violation or not. To conduct this research, the concept of a suspect or witness studied qualitatively based on the other countries and Mongolia's sources of criminal law, legal proceedings, legal provisions and statistics according to the international treaties. At last the research suggests that it is necessary to include the regulations reflecting the rights and responsibilities of a suspect in the Criminal Procedure Law, which will eliminate the gap of the law in the future.
