南華大學機構典藏系統:Item 987654321/6774
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18278/19583 (93%)
Visitors : 1030355      Online Users : 2406
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/6774


    Title: 解構場所精神－後結構論述下之場所
    Other Titles: No More Heidegger, No More Genius Loci: a Poststructuralist View of Place
    Authors: 郭建慧
    Keywords: Heidegger
    Genius Loci
    Poststructuralism
    Place
    Massey
    Date: 2006-05-01
    Issue Date: 2010-12-23 09:46:53 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 南華大學建築與景觀學系環境藝術碩士班
    Abstract: This paper develops a critique of Christian Norberg-Schulz’s idea of genius loci, particularly its reliance on the philosophy of phenomenology that searches for the ontological essence of a given place. It argues that the phenomenological tradition in which the ontological view of a given place is to be inscribed in architectural forms adequately disentangles architecture and its changing context, and actually formulates a normative guideline, imposing uniformity on architecture without taking evolutionary historical conditions into account.By drawing on poststructuralism, this paper rails against any conception of “naturalness” to reveal the constitutive mechanism of power/knowledge networks that have an effect on our perception of things as natural or ontological, and to approve the inability to grasp an unchangeable totality or ontological essence of a thing. Moving from the phenomenological conception of place to a constructive one, I mainly take Doreen Massey’s various thoughts concerning “nature,” “space” and “place” as the guiding threads for my argument here. Massey’s argument disputes Heideggerian views of place in relation to “being” and suggests that the sense of place is a social product and that therefore there is no static ontological nature of a given place. In application, I shall point out the problems of the phenomenological perspective of viewing place as natural, permanent, and therefore prior to other mechanisms those also construct cultural identity and dominate architectural form.
    Relation: 環境與藝術學刊
    4期
    Appears in Collections:[The Journals of Nanhua University ] Journal of environment and art
    [Department of Architecture and Landscape Design] Journal of environment and art

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    4053000405.pdf381KbAdobe PDF386View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML464View/Open


    All items in NHUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback