| 摘要: | 作為哲學詮釋學之經典，《真理與方法》不但揭示高達美詮釋學哲思諸基本觀念與理論要素如「遊戲」，「詮釋學循環」，「效應歷史」，「視域融合」，「問答對話辯證法」等，也隱涵著在其所提示的詮釋學三向度中亦即藝術向度、歷史或精神科學向度及語言向度的詮釋學哲思基設：事理性，歷史性與語言性。詮釋學之諸基設間及諸理論要素間的關係乃非系統奠基式的，而是體系性的，亦即互證相立，聯通融動的。本文便企圖透過對於《真理與方法》三大部份之為三大詮釋學向度中各自的基本或核心觀念亦即「遊戲」與「形象」，「生命」與「此有」以及「道成肉身」之「言道」之文本內在性詮釋來呈現該經典中所隱涵的詮釋學三基設及其間體系性的關係。就文本內在性詮釋而言，對於每組觀念之文本均先揭示其基本脈絡之鋪陳，然後梳理出其論述架構及其所隱涵的基設。然而就之義理內在性通論而言，三段文本詮釋正好通過其間基設之互聯而連貫自成為關於高達美詮釋學之整合性通論。
As a classic of philosophical hermeneutics, "Truth and Method", not only reveals Gadamer’s Hermeneutics philosophizing basic concepts and theoretical elements such as the "game", "hermeneutical circle" "effect-history", "fusion of horizons", "dialectic dialogue of question and answer" and so on, but also implies the three ground-presuppositions of hermeneutics–matter-of-factness, historicality, and linguisticality – in its three dimensions, ie die hermeneutical dimension of art, history or human science (Geistewissenschaft). The relations between the ground-presuppositions, basic concepts and theoretical elements are not systematic or fundamental-deductive, but systemic, which means that each one correlates with, interacts and confirms each other. This paper will attempt through a text-immanent interpretation of the basic or core concept of Gadamer’s hermeneutics like "play" and "image", "life" and "Dasein" and "incarnation" and "Word" in the three major parts in "Truth and Method" as the three hermeneutical dimensions to present the three hermeneutical ground-presuppositions and their systemic relations which imply in this work. For the purpose of text-immanent interpretation, it shall firstly reveal the lay-out of basic context for each concept-set, and then expose its framework of discourse and therefore the implied ground-presupposition. However, as regards the system-immanent dimension of a whole theory, the three text-immanent interpretations integrate into a coherent and holistic representation of Gadamer’s hermeneutics just through the interrelation of the three ground-presuppositions. |
