English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 18278/19583 (93%)
造訪人次 : 1035650      線上人數 : 355
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/29662


    題名: 出版產業應用AI技術的風險分析
    其他題名: Risk Analysis of the Application of AI Technology in the Publishing House
    作者: 楊佳人
    YANG, CHIA-JEN
    貢獻者: 文化創意事業管理學系
    黃昱凱;洪林伯
    HUANG, YU-KAI;HUNG, LIN-BAO
    關鍵詞: 人工智慧;出版產業;風險分析;層級架構分析
    Artificial Intelligence;Publishing Industry;Risk Analysis;Analytic Hierarchy Process
    日期: 2023
    上傳時間: 2023-11-09 10:04:47 (UTC+8)
    摘要:   近年來,出版社開始探索和應用人工智能(AI)技術來改進出版流程、編輯和銷售策略。然而,AI技術的應用也帶來了一些風險和挑戰。本研究旨在對出版社應用AI技術的風險進行分析。本研究首先對出版社應用AI技術的現狀進行了調查和分析。調查結果顯示,出版社最常應用AI技術的領域包括自然語言處理、圖像識別、推薦系統和大數據分析。AI技術的應用主要目的是提高出版效率、提高銷售量和客戶滿意度。本研究根據SHELL模型建構出版社應用AI技術的風險評估架構,並歸納出「軟體」、「硬體」、「環境」、「人員」等四項構面。6. 整體權重分析結果顯示「(E 2) 法律規範」、(L 1) 主管重視程度」、「(L 2) 資訊人員能力」是出版社應用AI技術最需關心的三項評估準則。最後,本研究提出了一些建議,以幫助出版社降低AI技術應用的風險。建議包括加強數據隱私保護、提高人工智能的公正性和透明度、採用AI技術與人工智能相互補充的方式、強化技術管理和安全防範意識等。
      In recent years, publishers have begun exploring and applying artificial intelligence (AI) technology to improve their publishing processes, editing, and sales strategies. However, the application of AI technology also brings some risks and challenges. This study aims to analyze the risks of applying AI technology in publishing. The study first surveyed and analyzed the current status of publishers' application of AI technology. The survey results show that the most commonly applied areas of AI technology in publishing include natural language processing, image recognition, recommendation systems, and extensive data analysis. The primary purpose of using AI technology is to improve publishing efficiency and increase sales and customer satisfaction. Based on the SHELL model, this study constructed a risk assessment framework for publishers' application of AI technology and identified four dimensions: “software,” “hardware,” “environment,” and “personnel.” The overall weight analysis results show that “(E 2) Legal Regulations,” “(L 1) Supervisor's Emphasis,” and “(L 2) Information Personnel's Ability” are the top three evaluation criteria that publishers should be most concerned about when applying AI technology. Finally, this study proposes suggestions to help publishers reduce the risks of using AI technology. The recommendations include strengthening data privacy protection, improving the fairness and transparency of AI, adopting a complementary approach between AI technology and human intelligence, and enhancing technology management and security awareness.
    顯示於類別:[文化創意事業管理學系] 博碩士論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    111NHU00785017-001.pdf1228KbAdobe PDF220檢視/開啟
    index.html0KbHTML253檢視/開啟


    在NHUIR中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋