南華大學機構典藏系統:Item 987654321/8072
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 18278/19583 (93%)
Visitors : 2123542      Online Users : 474
RC Version 7.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nhuir.nhu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/8072


    Title: 從歐洲憲法條約到里斯本條約:歐洲整合進程的回顧與展望
    Other Titles: From the Constitutional Treaty to the Treaty of Lisbon: A Review of European Integration Process and Its Prospect
    Authors: 張心怡
    Hsin-yi Chang
    Contributors: 南華大學國際暨大陸事務學系
    Department of International Studies, Nanhua University
    Keywords: 歐洲聯盟;歐洲憲法條約;里斯本條約;整合進程
    European Union;TECE;Treaty of Lisbon;Integration Process
    Date: 2011-07-01
    Issue Date: 2011-09-06 11:11:32 (UTC+8)
    Publisher: 南華大學歐洲研究所
    Abstract: 歐洲聯盟可說是當前區域整合中最成功的案例,惟回顧過去,歐洲整合進程的推動並非全然一帆風順,其間曾數度面臨阻撓與頓挫,其中又以法、荷否決歐盟憲政發展與體制改革里程碑的「歐洲憲法條約」一事,對歐洲整合運動打擊最甚,而作為歐憲條約替代方案的「里斯本條約」,其批准過程更數度面臨頓挫,憲條約替代方案的「里斯本條約」,其批准過程更數度面臨頓挫,2009年12月1日正式生效,方才結束了整合進程自法、荷否決歐憲條約以來長期停滯不前的窘況。本文旨在回顧歐洲整合進程在歐憲條約批准失敗到里斯本條約正式生效這段期間的發展經過,並從發生爭議國家之立場,闡述其對於歐洲進一步邁向深化整合的疑慮,其次針對歐盟內部的民主治理問題、里斯本條約內容是否達成制憲目標以及歐盟彈性協商方式對未來整合進程之影響等三項課題加以分析,檢視里斯本條約內容是否達成制憲之初衷,最後則展望歐洲未來邁向進一步政治整合所將面臨的困難與挑戰。
    The European Union is probably the most successful example of regional integration at present. However, the European integration process is not always a smooth ride. One of the most significant obstacles came from the French and Dutch referenda rejecting the Constitutional Treaty (TECE) in 2005 and the following episodes during the ratification process of the Treaty of Lisbon. This paper tends to review the European integration process during this period and is structured as follows. First of all, it examines the European integration process during the period between the French and Dutch referenda rejecting the Constitutional Treaty and the entered into force of the Lisbon Treaty, and aims to realize what lessons were drawn from this incident and the considerations and strategies of the European political leaders to choose the particular path to move forward with reform. Secondly, this paper intends to articulate a precise picture of the main differences and important innovations of the Lisbon Treaty in comparing to the abandoned Constitutional Treaty. Finally, it concludes with more general observations and identifies the challenges the EU might be met in the future integration process.
    Relation: 歐洲國際評論
    7期
    Appears in Collections:[The Journals of Nanhua University ] European journal of international review
    [Department of International and China Studies, The M.A. Program of Asia-Pacific Studies and Public Policy Studies] European journal of international review
    [Department of International and China Studies, The M.A. Program of Asia-Pacific Studies and Public Policy Studies] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    5023000703.pdf755KbAdobe PDF4537View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML829View/Open


    All items in NHUIR are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback